Feagin v. Meetze
Plaintiff: McIver Rembert Feagin, Jr
Defendant: William Vickery Meetze
Case Number: 1:2010cv01890
Filed: July 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Aiken Office
County: Florence
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Presiding Judge: Sol Blatt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 11 and incorporates it herein. It if therefore ORDERED that the Complaint in the above captioned case is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance of service of process. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 12/10/2010. (mcot, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Feagin v. Meetze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: McIver Rembert Feagin, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Vickery Meetze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?