Hesik v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Allen Hesik
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Case Number: 1:2012cv00014
Filed: January 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Aiken Office
County: Aiken
Presiding Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER AND OPINION denying 69 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 11/4/2014.(asni, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hesik v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Allen Hesik
Represented By: John E Parker
Represented By: William Franklin Barnes, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Represented By: Monteith Powell Todd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?