Kiesner v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: James Kiesner
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 1:2012cv00448
Filed: February 1, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Aiken Office
County: Aiken
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Presiding Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER AND OPINION RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 26 Report and Recommendation and granting 20 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Starbucks Corporation Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 7/9/2013. (asni, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kiesner v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: William L Duda
Represented By: Listervelt Bakari Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Kiesner
Represented By: Janet Elizabeth Rhodes
Represented By: Benjamin M Mabry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?