Young v. Griffin et al
| Rodney David Young |
| Tammy Hamilton, Mary Hammond and Christopher Griffin |
| 1:2012cv03009 |
| October 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Aiken Office |
| Pickens |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER ADOPTING 90 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 62 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed Christopher Griffin, D Sisco, Tammy Hamilton and 80 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Mary Hammond. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 62 and 80) are granted and this complaint is dismissed. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 11/15/2013. (abuc)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER denying 53 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 56 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 67 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 9/25/2013.(abuc)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER: The court has not received any response from Plaintiff to Defendants' motion. Plaintiff is directed to file a response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment by August 9, 2013. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to file a response to the arguments in Defendants' motion for summary judgment, the undersigned will recommended that the motion be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 7/9/2013. (abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
