Davis v. Byars et al
| Tamel Davis |
| Florence Mauney, Larry Cartledge, William R Byars, Jr and Rhonda Abston |
| 1:2013cv00738 |
| March 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Aiken Office |
| Anderson |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| David C Norton |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice. (abuc)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER affirming 44 Report and Recommendation, dismissing case with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 4/7/2014.(eric, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER re 32 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Larry Cartledge, William R Byars, Jr, Rhonda Abston, Florence Mauney. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion. As such, it appears to the court that he does n ot oppose the motion and wishes to abandon this action. Plaintiff is directed to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment by March 6, 2014. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 2/20/2014. (abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
