Seibles v. Holder
Petitioner: Joshua Juston Seibles
Respondent: J E Thomas
Case Number: 1:2013cv02810
Filed: October 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Aiken Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Presiding Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this case is dismissed without prejudice. (abuc)
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER accepting 15 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's objections are overruled (Doc. #17) and the petition is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Terry L Wooten on 10/29/2014.(abuc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seibles v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J E Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joshua Juston Seibles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?