Patterson v. SCANA Corporation et al

Patterson v. SCANA Corporation et al

Plaintiff:	Corey A. Patterson, Sr.
Defendant:	SCANA Corporation
Case Number:	1:2014cv00717
Filed:	March 4, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Aiken Office
County:	XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	J Michelle Childs
Presiding Judge:	Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 23, 2014	Filing 33 ORDER AND OPINION RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 29 Report and Recommendation, granting 22 Motion to Dismiss and dismissing the plaintiff's amended complaint with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 9/23/2014. (asni, )
June 4, 2014	Filing 27 ORDER re 22 MOTION to Dismiss filed by SCANA Corporation. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion. As such, it appears to the court that he does not oppose the motion and wishes to abandon this action. Ba sed on the foregoing, Plaintiff is directed to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment by June 18, 2014. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 6/4/2014. (abuc)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 23, 2014

Filing 33 ORDER AND OPINION RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 29 Report and Recommendation, granting 22 Motion to Dismiss and dismissing the plaintiff's amended complaint with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 9/23/2014. (asni, )

June 4, 2014

Filing 27 ORDER re 22 MOTION to Dismiss filed by SCANA Corporation. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion. As such, it appears to the court that he does not oppose the motion and wishes to abandon this action. Ba sed on the foregoing, Plaintiff is directed to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment by June 18, 2014. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 6/4/2014. (abuc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson v. SCANA Corporation et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: SCANA Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corey A. Patterson, Sr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?