Mosley v. Quicken Loans Inc
| Tyrone Mosley |
| Quicken Loans Inc |
| 1:2016cv00383 |
| February 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Aiken Office |
| Barnwell |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
145
ORDER AND OPINION denying 138 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment pursuant to Rules 52(b) and 59(e) of the Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 7/9/2018.(asni, )
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING 71 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING 74 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING AS MOOT 95 Motion in Limine; 96 Motion in Limine. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 3/9/2018. (mbro, )
|
|
Filing
29
AMENDED ORDER AND OPINION denying 10 MOTION to Remand. Document amended to correct scrivener's error. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 7/5/2016. (asni, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 6/30/2016.(asni, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER AND OPINION denying 10 Motion to Remand. This court grants Plaintiff an extension in order to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5). The response to the Motion is due by May 16, 2016. Any subsequent replies shall be filed by May 26, 2016. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 4/27/2016.(asni, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
