Curry v. United States Supreme Court et al
James B. Curry |
United States Supreme Court and Scott S. Harris |
1:2016cv02733 |
August 2, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Aiken Office |
Lee |
Joseph F Anderson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER adopting as modified the 8 RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and the complaint is summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 11/30/17. (mflo, ) |
Filing 28 ORDER allowing Plaintiff until August 3, 2017 to respond to 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 7/20/2017. (mwal) |
Filing 12 ORDER adopting as modified the 8 Report and Recommendation and dismissing the complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. on 11/9/2016. (bgoo) |
Filing 7 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service and advising plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any change of address. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350. Motions granted: 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 8/12/2016. (mwal) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.