Wiggins v. Wallace et al
Plaintiff: Derell Dewitt Wiggins
Defendant: Brian Wallace, Mark Richardson, Richard Neil and Briana Murphy
Case Number: 1:2018cv01448
Filed: May 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Aiken Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER adopting the 116 Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 104 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary Judgment is granted for Defendants on all claims exce pt those against Defendants McCullough, Almazan, Alexander, Rowell and Neal, in their individual capacities, for the use of excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Signed by Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on 3/11/2020. (lbak)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER denying 98 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 6/7/2019. (lbak)
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER directing defense counsel to advise by February 26, 2019, via a brief filing on the docket, whether she or other counsel is authorized to accept service on behalf of Brandon Rowell, or otherwise provide the last known address where he may be served. (Specific Document due by 2/26/2019.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/12/2019. (lbak)
December 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER directing defense counsel to advise the court by December 17, 2018, via a brief filing on the docket, whether she or other counsel is authorized to accept service on behalf of Richard Neil or the last known address where he may be served. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 12/7/2018. (bgoo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wiggins v. Wallace et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derell Dewitt Wiggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Neil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Briana Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?