Puckett v. Joyner
| James Benjamin Puckett |
| Hector Joyner |
| 1:2018cv02404 |
| August 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| David C Norton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #15 Order on Report and Recommendation and #16 Judgment placed in U.S. Mail to James Benjamin Puckett (bgoo) |
| Filing 16 JUDGMENT dismissing the action without prejudice. (bgoo) |
Filing 15
ORDER affirming #11 Report and Recommendation, dismissing petition without prejudice and without requiring respondent to file a return. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 10/16/2018.(eric, )
|
| Filing 13 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #10 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, served on US Attorney General on October 2, 2018. (lbak) |
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #10 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, placed in U.S. Mail to James Benjamin Puckett. Order #10 and copy of petition sent via certified mail to US Attorney General (article number 7004 1160 0002 3808 6053) (lbak) |
| Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the court dismiss the #1 petition without prejudice and without requiring the respondent to file a return. Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 9/27/2018. (lbak) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 9/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition) (lbak)
|
| Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX300078169 (lbak) |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order and IFP application placed in U.S. Mail to James Benjamin Puckett (bgoo) |
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER (Case to be brought into proper form by 9/28/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 9/6/2018. (bgoo)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by James Benjamin Puckett. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Cover Page, #3 Envelope) (bgoo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Puckett v. Joyner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James Benjamin Puckett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Hector Joyner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
