Ridley v. Budz et al
Plaintiff: Richard Ridley
Defendant: Mark Davis, Timothy Budz, Dr. Christopher Kunkle, Chandra Goodwin and Captain Arnold
Case Number: 1:2018cv02716
Filed: October 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Referring Judge: Margaret B Seymour
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2018 Filing 16 ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED #14 Certified Copy of the Order and pdf of the nef to Jeanette McBride. (lbak)
November 7, 2018 Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #14 Order placed in U.S. Mail to Richard Ridley. (lbak)
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #10 motion to remand to State Court and granting Plaintiff's #11 motion to amend the complaint. Clerk is directed to remand the case to the Court of Common Pleas for Richland County, South Carolina. Signed by Honorable Margaret B. Seymour on 11/7/2018. Clerk's Notice: Attorneys are responsible for supplementing the State Record with all documents filed in Federal Court. (lbak)
October 30, 2018 Filing 13 RESPONSE in Support re #11 MOTION to Amend/Correct, #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court Response filed by Captain Arnold, Timothy Budz, Mark Davis, Chandra Goodwin, Christopher Kunkle. (Gende, Mark)
October 24, 2018 Filing 12 Letter from Richard Ridley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak)
October 16, 2018 Filing 11 MOTION to Amend/Correct by Richard Ridley. Response to Motion due by 10/30/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak)
October 16, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Richard Ridley. Response to Motion due by 10/30/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/16/2018: #2 Certificate of Service) (lbak).
October 9, 2018 Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order to Notify of Address Change, #8 Scheduling Order placed in U.S. Mail to Richard Ridley. (lbak)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/5/2018, Discovery due by 12/4/2018, Motions due by 1/3/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/9/2018. (lbak)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/9/2018. (lbak)
October 5, 2018 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Captain Arnold, Timothy Budz, Mark Davis, Chandra Goodwin, Christopher Kunkle. (lbak)
October 5, 2018 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Captain Arnold, Timothy Budz, Mark Davis, Chandra Goodwin, Christopher Kunkle. (lbak)
October 5, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018CP4003256. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8038714), filed by Captain Arnold, Mark Davis, Christopher Kunkle, Timothy Budz, Chandra Goodwin. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents Summons and Complaint, #2 State Court Documents Motion and Affidavit) (lbak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ridley v. Budz et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Ridley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Davis
Represented By: Ryan Joseph Patane
Represented By: Mark V Gende
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Budz
Represented By: Ryan Joseph Patane
Represented By: Mark V Gende
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Christopher Kunkle
Represented By: Ryan Joseph Patane
Represented By: Mark V Gende
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chandra Goodwin
Represented By: Ryan Joseph Patane
Represented By: Mark V Gende
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain Arnold
Represented By: Ryan Joseph Patane
Represented By: Mark V Gende
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?