Dailey v. Bureau Of Prisons
| Ernest D. Dailey |
| Bureau Of Prisons |
| 1:2019cv00662 |
| March 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #10 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer served on US Attorney General on 4/29/2019. (lbak) |
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #10 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer and #11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail to Ernest D. Dailey. #10 Order and Habeas Petition sent certified mail to The Attorney General of the United States. Article number: 7004-1160-0002-3808-6206. (lbak) Modified on 4/25/2019 to edit text. (lbak) |
| Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending dismissing the #7 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without service of process and without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 5/8/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/24/2019. (lbak) |
Filing 10
ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Motion denied without prejudice: #8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Amended 2241 Habeas Petition) (lbak) Modified on 4/25/2019 to edit filed date. (lbak)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Ernest D. Dailey. Response to Motion due by 4/8/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ernest D. Dailey. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (lbak) |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, IFP Application and blank 2241 Habeas Petition placed in U.S. Mail to Ernest D. Dailey. (lbak) |
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 4/2/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 3/12/2019. (lbak)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus, filed by Ernest D. Dailey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bgoo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dailey v. Bureau Of Prisons | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ernest D. Dailey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bureau Of Prisons | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
