Cooper v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Jennifer Nalley Cooper |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administrative Record |
| 1:2019cv02540 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Nalley Cooper. Commissioner of Social Security Administration served on 9/12/19, pursuant to Local Rule 83.VII.03 answer due 1/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(Jordan, Woodrow). Modified on 9/27/2019 to add text(bshr, ). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (bshr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8659104.) Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website., filed by Jennifer Nalley Cooper. Service due by 12/9/2019(bshr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
