Price v. Barnett et al
| 1:2020cv02166 |
| August 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Aiken Office |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
JUDGMENT dismissing the action with prejudice. (lbak)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER Plaintiff is directed to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with the case and to file a response to Karissa's 19 motion for summary judgment by September 23, 2020. Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Objections to R&R due by 9/23/2020 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 9/9/2020. (lbak)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying 26 MOTION to Amend/Correct. Wells is directed to advise the court by August 25, 2020, whether she consents to Plaintiff's motion to dismiss her from this lawsuit. (Specific Document due by 8/25/2020.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 8/11/2020. (lbak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Price v. Barnett et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
