Gonzalez v. Phelps
Jesus M. Gonzalez |
Warden Phelps |
1:2020cv03687 |
October 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Donald C Coggins |
Shiva V Hodges |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Roseboro Order placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Jesus M. Gonzalez, 45537-069, Edgefield Federal Prison Camp, PO Box 725, Edgefield, SC 29824. (lbak) |
Filing 9 ROSEBORO ORDER directing clerk to forward explanation of dismissal procedures to the opposing party and directing that party to respond in 31 days. Response due to #8 MOTION to Dismiss. Response to Motion due by 1/19/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 12/16/2020. (lbak) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Warden Phelps. Response to Motion due by 12/29/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Declaration of J. Carter)No proposed order.Motions referred to Shiva V Hodges.(Prince, Marshall) |
Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #5 Order 2241 Federal Habeas served on US Attorney General on 11/2/2020. (mmcd) |
Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Order 2241 Federal Habeas placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Jesus M. Gonzalez, 45537-069, Edgefield Federal Prison Camp, PO Box 725, Edgefield, SC 29824; #5 Order 2241 Federal Habeas and 2241 Habeas Petition sent certified mail to The Attorney General of the United States. Article number: 7017-1450-0001-4670-8676. (lbak) |
Filing 5 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Motion granted: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 2241 Habeas Petition) (lbak) |
Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Anderson/Greenwood. (bgoo) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Jesus M. Gonzalez. Response to Motion due by 11/4/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (bgoo) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jesus M. Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bgoo) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/21/2020 with corrected scan of document.) (bgoo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Phelps | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jesus M. Gonzalez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Phelps | |
Represented By: | Marshall Prince |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.