Oppenheimer v. Gary et al
Plaintiff: David Oppenheimer
Defendant: CLC Asia, LLC doing business as CLC Hardwoods and Albert V Gary
Case Number: 1:2021cv00280
Filed: January 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Sherri A Lydon
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2021 Filing 16 TEXT ORDER granting #13 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead. The deadline to answer, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to April 29, 2021. Signed by the Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on 03/25/2021.(ahil)
March 25, 2021 Filing 14 TEXT ORDER granting Amended Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #12 and declaring Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #10 moot. The original motion states that prior to filing Plaintiff's counsel conferred with opposing counsel who indicated that they do not intend to oppose the motion. [ECF No. 10.] At that time, counsel for Defendant had not entered an appearance. Two days later, counsel for Defendant filed a notice of appearance, and an amended motion to appear pro hac vice followed. [ECF Nos. 11, 12.] The amended motion indicates that Defendants will likely oppose the motion. [ECF No. 12.] The deadline to oppose the motion was March 22, 2021. To date, Defendant has not filed an opposition to the amended motion. As a result, the court hereby GRANTS ECF No. 12 without opposition and DECLARES ECF No. 10 MOOT. Entered at the direction of Honorable Sherri A. Lydon on 03/25/2021.(ahil)
March 24, 2021 Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead by CLC Asia, LLC, Albert V Gary. Response to Motion due by 4/7/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Stacy, Megan)
March 8, 2021 Filing 12 Amended Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice in support of pro hac vice application Dana LeJune by David Oppenheimer. Response to Motion due by 3/22/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Application Pro Hac Vice Dana LeJune, #2 Supporting Documents Certificate of Good Standing Dana LeJune)No proposed order.(Allen, Samuel) Modified on 3/9/2021 to correct event type (mflo, ).
March 5, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan McGee Stacy on behalf of CLC Asia, LLC, Albert V Gary (Stacy, Megan)
March 3, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Dana LeJune ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0420-9686140) by David Oppenheimer. Response to Motion due by 3/17/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Application Pro Hac Vice Dana LeJune, #2 Supporting Documents Certificate of Good Standing Dana LeJune, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Allen, Samuel)
March 3, 2021 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE by David Oppenheimer. Albert V Gary waiver executed on 1/29/2021, answer due 3/30/2021. (Allen, Samuel) (Main Document 9 replaced and additional attachment(s) added on 3/4/2021: #1 Waiver of Service of Summons on CLC Hardwoods, as provided by the filer.) (ahil)
March 3, 2021 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE by David Oppenheimer. CLC Asia, LLC waiver executed on 1/29/2021, answer due 3/30/2021. (Allen, Samuel) (Main Document 8 replaced and additional attachment(s) added on 3/4/2021: #1 Waiver of Service of Summons on CLC Hardwoods, as provided by the filer.) (ahil)
January 29, 2021 Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED #6 Report on the Filing or Determination of Copyright to 508filings@loc.gov, Copyright Office (ahil)
January 29, 2021 Filing 6 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright. (ahil)
January 28, 2021 Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by David Oppenheimer.(ahil)
January 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLC Asia, LLC, Albert V Gary ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9616087.), filed by David Oppenheimer. Service due by 4/28/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 THE WORK, #2 Exhibit 2 CERTIFICATE OF COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION, #3 Exhibit 3 NFRINGING IMAGES, #4 Exhibit 4 PLAINTIFFS NOTICE LETTER)(ahil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oppenheimer v. Gary et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Oppenheimer
Represented By: Samuel K Allen
Represented By: Dana Andrew Lejune
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CLC Asia, LLC doing business as CLC Hardwoods
Represented By: Megan McGee Stacy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Albert V Gary
Represented By: Megan McGee Stacy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?