Arflin v. Stephan
| Bobby Joe Arflin |
| Warden Michael Stephan |
| 1:2021cv00542 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Douglas Ross on behalf of Michael Stephan (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Ross, Michael)
|
|
Filing 11
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by Michael Stephan. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Brown, Melody)
|
|
Filing 10
***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Order 2254 placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Bobby Joe Arflin, 365273, Broad River Corr. Inst., 4460 Broad River Rd., Columbia, SC 29210. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER authorizing service of process. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. (Return and Memorandum due by 4/28/2021.) Motion granted: #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 3/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 2254 Habeas Petition) (lbak)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Bobby Joe Arflin. Response to Motion due by 3/22/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 6
***DOCUMENTS MAILED #5 Proper Form Order and IFP Application placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Bobby Joe Arflin, 365273, Broad River Corr. Inst., 4460 Broad River Rd., Columbia, SC 29210. (lbak/bgoo)
|
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER (Case to be brought into proper form by 3/16/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6.) Motion denied: #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/23/2021. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 3
TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Anderson/Greenwood. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Bobby Joe Arflin. Response to Motion due by 3/8/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Bobby Joe Arflin. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Envelope) (lbak)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Arflin v. Stephan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Michael Stephan | |
| Represented By: | Michael Douglas Ross |
| Represented By: | Melody Jane Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Bobby Joe Arflin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
