Jenkins v. Estill (FCI) Food Service Administrator
| Steve Jenkins |
| Estill (FCI) Food Service Administrator, Cook Supervisor and Food Service Administrator |
| 1:2021cv00557 |
| February 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Henry M Herlong |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steve Jenkins. Attorney General for the United States served on 4/5/2021, answer due 6/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (lbak)
|
|
Filing 17
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steve Jenkins. Food Service Administrator served on 3/31/2021, answer due 6/1/2021. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 16
Letter from Steve Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (mmcd)
|
|
Filing 14
Summons Issued as to Cook Supervisor, Food Service Administrator. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Service due by 6/28/2021. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 13
***DOCUMENT MAILED #12 Order 1983 placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Steve Jenkins, 07390-104, Coleman Correctional Complex Low, PO Box 1031, Coleman, FL 33521. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Plaintiff is also directed to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 3/29/2021. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 9
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Food Service Administrator, Cook Supervisor, filed by Steve Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (lbak)
|
|
Filing 8
***DOCUMENTS MAILED #6 Proper Form Order, #7 Order and one standard complaint form placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Steve Jenkins, 07390-104, Coleman Correctional Complex Low, PO Box 1031, Coleman, FL 33521. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER AND NOTICE Plaintiff may attempt to correct the defects in his #1 complaint by filing an amended complaint by March 24, 2021, along with any appropriate service documents. Plaintiff is reminded an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and should be complete in itself. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to cure the deficiencies identified above, the undersigned will recommend to the district court that the claims specified above be dismissed without leave for further amendment. (Specific Document due by 3/24/2021.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 3/10/2021. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 6
PROPER FORM ORDER (Case to be brought into proper form by 3/24/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6.), Motion granted: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 3/10/2021. (lbak) Modified on 3/10/2021 to clarify docket text. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 4
TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Beaufort. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Steve Jenkins. Response to Motion due by 3/10/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Inmate Statement, #3 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Estill (FCI) Food Service Administrator, filed by Steve Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (lbak)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
