Chestnut v. Rhodes
Petitioner: Raymond Chestnut
Respondent: M. Rhodes and Director M. Rhodes
Case Number: 1:2021cv01068
Filed: April 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Referring Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2021 Filing 9 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #5 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, served on US Attorney General on 4/22/2021. (lbak)
April 15, 2021 Filing 8 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #5 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and 7 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Raymond Chestnut, HCO2172158220, J. Reuben Long Detention Center, 4150 J. Reuben Long Ave., Conway, SC 29526; #5 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer and 2241 Habeas Petition sent certified mail to the United States Attorney General. Article Number: 7017 1450 0001 4670 8829. (lbak, )
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/15/2021. (lbak)
April 15, 2021 Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the district judge dismiss the #1 petition in the above-captioned matter. Objections to R&R due by 4/29/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/15/2021. (lbak)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 2241 Habeas Petition) (lbak)
April 13, 2021 Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (mmcd)
April 12, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Raymond Chestnut. Response to Motion due by 4/26/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (mmcd)
April 12, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Raymond Chestnut. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope) (mmcd) (Main Document 1, Attachment 1,and Attachment 2 replaced on 4/13/2021 with corrected scan of document). (mmcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chestnut v. Rhodes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Raymond Chestnut
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. Rhodes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director M. Rhodes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?