Nanney v. Dapartment of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff: Mr. James D. Nanney and RENT-A-MAN Construction
Defendant: Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 1:2021cv02356
Filed: July 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Referring Judge: Mary Geiger Lewis
Nature of Suit: Prison:Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by James D. Nanney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak)
August 6, 2021 Filing 9 Letter from James D. Nanney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak)
August 3, 2021 Filing 8 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #7 Order and one standard complaint form placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to James D. Nanney, 0298657, Alexander C.I., 633 Old Landfill Rd., Taylorsville, NC 28681. (lbak)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER AND NOTICE Plaintiff may attempt to correct the defects in his complaint by filing an amended complaint within 21 days of this order, along with any appropriate service documents. Plaintiff is reminded that an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and should be complete in itself. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to cure the deficiencies identified above, the court will recommend to the district court that the claims be dismissed. (Specific Document due by 8/24/2021.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 8/3/2021. (lbak)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 8/3/21. (vhor)
July 29, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by James D. Nanney. Response to Motion due by 8/12/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Account Statement, #2 Envelope) No proposed order. Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak)
July 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service, filed by James D. Nanney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nanney v. Dapartment of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mr. James D. Nanney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RENT-A-MAN Construction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?