Chestnut v. Rhodes
| Raymond Chestnut |
| Director Rhodes |
| 1:2021cv03766 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Raymond Chestnut. Response to Motion due by 1/5/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Envelope) (lbak) |
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #10 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation and #11 Judgment placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Raymond Chestnut, HC10132105952, J. Reuben Long Detention Center, 4150 J. Reuben Long Ave., Conway, Sc 29526. (lbak) |
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT dismissing the action without prejudice. (lbak) |
Filing 10
ORDER adopting the #6 Report and Recommendation, dismissing Petitioner's #1 2241 petition without prejudice and without requiring Respondent to file an answer or return. Signed by Chief Judge R. Bryan Harwell on 12/21/2021. (lbak)
|
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 5 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Raymond Chestnut, HC10132105952, J. Reuben Long Detention Center, 4150 J. Reuben Long Ave., Conway, Sc 29526. (lbak) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the court dismiss the #1 petition without prejudice and without requiring respondent to file a return. Objections to R&R due by 12/3/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 11/19/2021. (lbak) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 11/19/21. (vhor)
|
| Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (lbak) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Raymond Chestnut. Response to Motion due by 12/1/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Raymond Chestnut. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chestnut v. Rhodes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Raymond Chestnut | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director Rhodes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
