Coakley v. Young et al
Plaintiff: Danielle Coakley
Defendant: Robert Franklin Young and Finish Line Trucking
Case Number: 1:2022cv01728
Filed: June 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Terry L Wooten
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2022 Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion to Substitute Attorney Brandon Jones for Daniel Settana. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on July 28, 2022.(kbos)
July 26, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Finish Line Trucking, Robert Franklin Young. Response to Motion due by 8/9/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Jones, Brandon)
July 26, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon Paul Jones on behalf of Finish Line Trucking, Robert Franklin Young (Jones, Brandon)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER:Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 8/11/2022, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 8/25/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 8/25/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 9/16/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 10/17/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 11/15/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 5/2/2023, Discovery due by 3/17/2023, Motions due by 3/31/2023, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 5/2/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 6/1/2023, Mediation Due by 5/2/2023, Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on July 22, 2022. (kbos)
June 14, 2022 Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Danielle Coakley.(Alderson, Ryan)
June 2, 2022 Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Finish Line Trucking.(kbos)
June 2, 2022 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Robert Franklin Young.(kbos)
June 2, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas Aiken County, case number 2022-CP-02-685. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10522708), filed by Finish Line Trucking, Robert Franklin Young. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit Email)(kbos)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coakley v. Young et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Coakley
Represented By: Ryan Patrick Alderson
Represented By: Michael Anthony Melonakos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Franklin Young
Represented By: Daniel R Settana, Jr
Represented By: Brandon Paul Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Finish Line Trucking
Represented By: Daniel R Settana, Jr
Represented By: Brandon Paul Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?