Hensley v. United States of America
Petitioner: Todd Michael Hensley
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2022cv03970
Filed: November 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Henry M Herlong
Referring Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #12 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation, #13 Judgment placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Todd Michael Hensley, 13141087, Edgefield Prison Camp, 501 Gary Hill Rd., Edgefield, SC 29824. (dist)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 JUDGMENT dismissing the action without prejudice. (dist)
December 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 OPINION & ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Hodges' #5 Report and Recommendation, dismissing this petition without prejudice and without requiring the respondent to file an answer. Signed by Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr on 12/12/2022. (dist)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendation by Todd Michael Hensley. Reply to Objections due by 12/28/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dist)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX300102148 (lbak)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #4 Proper Form Order, #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and IFP Application placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Todd Michael Hensley, 13141087, Edgefield Prison Camp, 501 Gary Hill Rd., Edgefield, SC 29824. (lbak)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the district judge dismiss the #1 petition in the above-captioned matter without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 11/30/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 11/16/2022. (lbak)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 12/7/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 11/16/2022. (lbak)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Anderson/Greenwood. (dist)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Todd Michael Hensley. (Attachments: #1 Cover Page, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Request for Withdrawal of Inmates Personal Funds, #4 Envelope)(dist)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hensley v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Todd Michael Hensley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?