Small v. Matvsiewicz et al
| Edwin Evandar Small, Jr., Jugg, Van, Vandar, Evandar and Jugg Head |
| Lt. Matvsiewicz, Cpl Gee, Sgt Chris Neal and Food Service Supervisor |
| 1:2023cv06413 |
| December 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Summons Issued as to Gee, Matvsiewicz, Chris Neal. Service due by 5/1/2024. (lbak) |
| Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #14 Order 1983, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Edwin Evandar Small, Jr., 16300, Florence County Detention Center, 6719 Friendfield Rd., Effingham, SC 29541. (lbak) |
Filing 14
ORDER authorizing service of process. Plaintiff is also directed to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. (Service Document due by 2/20/2024.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 1/31/2024. (lbak)
|
| Filing 11 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #10 Proper Form Order, one Summons and four Forms USM-285 placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Edwin Evandar Small, Jr., 16300, Florence County Detention Center, 6719 Friendfield Rd., Effingham, SC 29541. (lbak) |
|
Filing 10
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 2/6/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 1/16/2024. (lbak)
|
| Filing 8 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 6 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #7 Proper Form Order, one Summons and four Forms USM-285 placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Edwin Evandar Small, Jr., 16300, Florence County Detention Center, 6719 Friendfield Rd., Effingham, SC 29541. (lbak) |
|
Filing 7
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 1/9/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 12/19/2023. (lbak)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER Plaintiff applied to proceed in the District Court without prepaying fees or costs. [ECF No. 2]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, the court construes this application as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. A review of the motion reveals that Plaintiff should be relieved of the obligation to prepay the full filing fee. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, subject to the court's right to require a payment if Plaintiff's financial condition changes, and to tax fees and costs against Plaintiff at the conclusion of this case if the court finds the case to be without merit. See Flint v. Haynes, 651 F.2d 970, 972-74 (4th Cir. 1981). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 12/19/23. (vhor)
|
| Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (lbak) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Edwin Evandar Small, Jr. Response to Motion due by 12/27/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Food Service Supervisor, Gee, Matvsiewicz, Chris Neal, filed by Edwin Evandar Small, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
