Wright v. United States of America, The
Plaintiff: Sallie C. Wright
Defendant: Christanna Ingram-Hofer and United States of America, The
Case Number: 1:2024cv00011
Filed: January 3, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Paige J Gossett
Referring Judge: Mary Geiger Lewis
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 7385 Energy Emp Occupational Illness Comp Program Act (EEOICPA)-Contr Emp Compensation
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2024 Filing 23 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 22 Transfer of Case Management, #21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Sallie C. Wright 230 Jehossee Dr. SE Aiken, SC 29801. (apsn)
February 29, 2024 Filing 22 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Mary Geiger Lewis. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: 901 Richland Street Columbia, SC 29201. (apsn)
February 29, 2024 Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this action be summarily dismissed without prejudice. In light of this recommendation, the Government's pending motion to dismiss should be terminated as moot. Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 02/28/2024. (apsn)
February 29, 2024 Filing 20 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 18 Order on Motion to Substitute Party placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Sallie C. Wright 230 Jehossee Dr. SE Aiken, SC 29801. (apsn)
February 28, 2024 Filing 18 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #11 Motion to Substitute Party. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 2/28/2024. (kkus, )
February 26, 2024 Filing 16 Letter from Sallie C. Wright. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(apsn)
January 17, 2024 Filing 11 MOTION to Substitute Party by United States of America, The. Response to Motion due by 1/31/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Certification)No proposed order.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(Stroud, Joanna) Modified to edit filer on 2/29/2024 (cbru, ).
January 17, 2024 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Order to Notify of Address Change, Local Civil Rule 26.01 form placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Sallie C. Wright 230 Jehossee Dr. SE Aiken, SC 29801. (apsn)
January 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes. Plaintiff is directed to submit fully completed and signed answers to the court's interrogatories pursuant to Local Civil Rule 26.01 (D.S.C.), which are attached to this order, within twenty-one (21) days from the date this order is entered. Due by 2/7/2024 (plus three days for mail time). Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 01/17/2024. (apsn)
January 11, 2024 Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Roseboro Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Sallie C. Wright 230 Jehossee Dr. SE Aiken, SC 29801. (apsn)
January 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ROSEBORO ORDER directing clerk to forward summary judgment explanation to the opposing party and directing that party to respond in 31 days. Response due to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (Subject Matter) Response to Motion due by 2/12/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett on 01/11/2024. (apsn)
January 10, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Subject Matter) by Christanna Ingram-Hofer. Response to Motion due by 1/24/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Rachel D. Pond with attachments, #2 Exhibit 2, Declaration of Sarah G. Naji)No proposed order.Motions referred to Paige J Gossett.(Stroud, Joanna)
January 3, 2024 Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Christanna Ingram-Hofer.(apsn)
January 3, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Aiken County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-02-02700, filed by Christanna Ingram-Hofer. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(apsn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. United States of America, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sallie C. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christanna Ingram-Hofer
Represented By: Joanna Brooks Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America, The
Represented By: Joanna Brooks Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?