Moore v. Young et al
Plaintiff: Richard Kareem Moore
Defendant: Solicitor: Elizabeth B. Young and Head Public Defender: DeGrant Gibbons
Case Number: 1:2024cv00458
Filed: January 29, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Referring Judge: Shiva V Hodges
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2024 Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Richard Kareem Moore 1006401 Aiken County Detention Center 435 Wire Road Aiken, SC 29801. (apsn)
March 4, 2024 Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Richard Kareem Moore 1006401 Aiken County Detention Center 435 Wire Road Aiken, SC 29801. (apsn)
March 4, 2024 Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending this case be dismissed without further leave for amendment. Objections to R&R due by 3/18/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 03/04/2024. (apsn)
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff applied to proceed in the District Court without prepaying fees or costs. [ECF No. 7]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, the court construes this application as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. A review of the motion reveals that Plaintiff should be relieved of the obligation to prepay the full filing fee. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, subject to the court's right to require a payment if Plaintiff's financial condition changes, and to tax fees and costs against Plaintiff at the conclusion of this case if the court finds the case to be without merit. See Flint v. Haynes, 651 F.2d 970, 972-74 (4th Cir. 1981). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 3/4/24. (vhor)
February 26, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Richard Kareem Moore. Response to Motion due by 3/11/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak)
February 9, 2024 Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Order and Notice, Form AO 240, Financial Certificate, one summons form, two USM forms, #4 Proper Form Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Richard Kareem Moore 1006401 Aiken County Detention Center 435 Wire Road Aiken, SC 29801. (apsn)
February 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER AND NOTICE: Plaintiff may attempt to correct the defects in his complaint by filing an amended complaint by March 1, 2024, along with any appropriate service documents. Plaintiff is reminded an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and should be complete in itself. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to cure the deficiencies identified above, the undersigned will recommend to the district court that the claims specified above be dismissed without leave for further amendment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 02/09/2024. (apsn)
February 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 3/1/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 02/09/2024. (apsn)
January 30, 2024 Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Aiken. (lbak)
January 29, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Head Public Defender: DeGrant Gibbons, Elizabeth B. Young, filed by Richard Kareem Moore. (Attachments: #1 Envelope 1, #2 Envelope 2) (lbak)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Young et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Kareem Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Solicitor: Elizabeth B. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Head Public Defender: DeGrant Gibbons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?