Ward v. Rose et al
Anthony Ward |
Director Rose, J Reuben Long Medical Staff and Medical of J. Reuben Long Detention |
1:2024cv00562 |
February 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Donald C Coggins |
Shiva V Hodges |
Prison:Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr (Other) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Anthony Ward, J Reuben Long Detention Center, 4150 J Reuben Long Ave., Conway, SC 29526. (lbak) |
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending this matter be summarily dismised without leave for further amendment. Objections to R&R due by 3/25/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 3/11/2024. (lbak) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Medical of J. Reuben Long Detention, filed by Anthony Ward. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak) |
Filing 9 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 6 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #7 Proper Form Order, #8 Order and Notice, one standard complaint, one Summons and two Forms USm-285 placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Anthony Ward, J Reuben Long Detention Center, 4150 J Reuben Long Ave., Conway, SC 29526. (lbak) |
Filing 8 ORDER AND NOTICE Plaintiff may attempt to correct the defects in his #1 complaint by filing an amended complaint by March 5, 2024, along with any appropriate service documents. Plaintiff is reminded that an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and should be complete in itself. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to cure the deficiencies identified above, the undersigned will recommend to the district court that the claims be dismissed without leave for further amendment. (Specific Document due by 3/5/2024.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/13/2024. (lbak) |
Filing 7 PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 3/5/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/13/2024. (lbak) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff applied to proceed in the District Court without prepaying fees or costs. [ECF No. 2]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, the court construes this application as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. A review of the motion reveals that Plaintiff should be relieved of the obligation to prepay the full filing fee. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, subject to the courts right to require a payment if Plaintiffs financial condition changes, and to tax fees and costs against Plaintiff at the conclusion of this case if the court finds the case to be without merit. See Flint v. Haynes, 651 F.2d 970, 972-74 (4th Cir. 1981). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/13/24. (vhor) |
Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (lbak) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Anthony Ward. Response to Motion due by 2/16/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J Reuben Long Medical Staff, Rose, filed by Anthony Ward. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.