Stroman v. Calhoun County Sheriffs Department et al
| Shaneeka Stroman |
| Calhoun County Sheriffs Department and St. Matthews Magistrate Court |
| 1:2024cv00698 |
| February 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #9 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation and #10 Judgment placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Shaneeka Stroman, 335 Horses Neck Rd., Swansea, SC 29160. (lbak) |
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice. (lbak) |
Filing 9
ORDER adopting the #5 Report and Recommendation, dismissing this petition without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 4/3/2024. (lbak)
|
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 4 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Shaneeka Stroman, 335 Horses Neck Rd., Swansea, SC 29160. (lbak) |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the district court summarily dismiss this action. Objections to R&R due by 3/1/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/16/2024. (lbak) |
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff applied to proceed in the District Court without prepaying fees or costs. [ECF No. 2]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, the court construes this application as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. A review of the motion reveals that Plaintiff should be relieved of the obligation to prepay the full filing fee. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, subject to the courts right to require a payment if Plaintiffs financial condition changes, and to tax fees and costs against Plaintiff at the conclusion of this case if the court finds the case to be without merit. See Flint v. Haynes, 651 F.2d 970, 972-74 (4th Cir. 1981). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 2/16/24. (vhor)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Shaneeka Stroman. Response to Motion due by 2/26/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Shaneeka Stroman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A-N explains the Supreme Court ruling on recovery possession of real estate, #3 Exhibit O - explains the written instrument in the register of deeds, #4 Exhibit P - explains that there was no forwarding address, #5 Exhibit Q - explains that property is vacant, #6 Exhibit R - explains that Carol B. Fischer cannot be found, #7 Exhibit S - explains that publication was published, #8 Exhibit T - explains that there is a Lis pendens for my interest, #9 Exhibit U - explains abandoned of property, #10 Exhibit V - explains vacancy of property, #11 Exhibit W - explains police report filed on Appellant, #12 Exhibit X - explains how Stroman wa violated, #13 Exhibit Y - explains publication notice, #14 Exhibit Z - wxplains charges brought upon Stroman, #15 Exhibit AB - explains special conditions of bon against Stroman) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
