Elliott v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Mara Elliott |
| Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing |
| 1:2024cv05110 |
| September 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER/ELECTRONIC CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.Plaintiffs Brief due by 12/13/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of 13, #2 Part 3 of 13, #3 Part 4 of 13, #4 Part 5 of 13, #5 Part 6 of 13, #6 Part 7 of 13, #7 Part 8 of 13, #8 Part 9 of 13, #9 Part 10 of 13, #10 Part 11 of 13, #11 Part 12 of 13, #12 Part 13 of 13)(Leach, David) |
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges. Signed by Honorable Donald C. Coggins, Jr on 10/21/2024. (cpri)
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Mara Elliott.. (McChesney, Paul) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 9/16/24. (vhor)
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER directing the parties' attention to the Court's Standing Order on All 42 U.S.C. 405(g) Social Security Disability Appeals Assigned to Judge Donald C. Coggins, Jr., located on the District Court's website. Within 30 days of the date of this Text Order, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file either a (1) signed and completed Notice, Consent, and Reference of Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, or (2) status report informing the Court that Plaintiff does not consent to disposition of this action by Magistrate Judge. Entered at the direction of Honorable Donald C. Coggins, Jr. on 09/16/2024. ( Status Report due by 10/16/2024.) Signed by Honorable Donald C. Coggins, Jr on 09/16/2024. (cpri)
|
| Filing 4 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Set Answer Deadline - Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on 11/15/2024. (cpri) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Mara Elliott. Response to Motion due by 9/30/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (cpri) Modified on 9/16/2024 to edit docket text. (cpri) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, filed by Mara Elliott. Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.03 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website.(cpri) Modified on 9/16/2024 to edit docket text. (cpri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
