Charles et al v Staff of Kershaw Correctional Institution
| Harry N Charles, II |
| Cecilia R Reynolds, Julie McKay, Jerry Washington, Penny West and Donald Beckwith |
| 2:2007cv01050 |
| April 24, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Charleston Office |
| Lancaster |
| Robert S Carr |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by Dr Harry N Charles II and 50 other Plaintiffs; the Clerk of Court is directed to assign new, separate civil action numbers to the fifty whose signatures appear on the signature page (other than Harry N Charles II) The Clerk of Court is authorized to strike all plaintiffs from the docket except Harry N Charles II, who will remain the plaintiff in this action. The Clerk of Court is authorized to "re-file" the pleading from this case in the fifty new cases . The initial docket entries in the "new" cases will be this order and the pleading. After docketing, the Clerk shall forward the files in this case and in the fifty new cases to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for initial review under 28 USC 1915, 28 USC 1915A and the General Order (Misc. No. 3:05-MC-5010-JFA). Signed by Judge Robert S Carr on 5/1/2007. (ssan, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
