Coker v. International Paper Company et al
| James Coker |
| International Paper Company, Lisa Prior, Kirk Carlson and John Grover |
| 2:2008cv01865 |
| May 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Georgetown |
| George C Kosko |
| David C Norton |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment as to plaintiff's federal claims and remanding state law claims to state court; adopting Report and Recommendations re 65 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Chief Judge David C Norton on March 18, 2010.(fulm, )
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER substituting party; Ronald J. Talbert, Esquire, Personal Representative to the Estate of James M. Coker, shall be substituted as plaintiff in this action. Signed by Chief Judge David C Norton on 2/25/2010. (eric, )
|
|
Filing
65
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant that the Defendants' motion for summary judgment 37 with respect to the federal claims asserted in this lawsuit be granted, and that those claims be dismissed. It is further recommended that Plaintiff's remaining state law claims then be remanded back to state court for disposition. Objections to R&R due by 10/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant on 9/22/09. (rpol, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
