Karges v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office et al
| George Karges |
| Charleston County Sheriff's Office and J Al Cannon, Jr |
| 2:2008cv02163 |
| June 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Charleston |
| Robert S Carr |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER AND OPINION granting 94 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 57 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to all causes of action except Plaintiff's claim for retaliation under Title VII. At trial, Plaintiff's retaliation claims will be limi ted to those based upon Plaintiff's removal from special assignments. vacating 84 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Report and Recommendations. The Charleston County Sheriff's office is dismissed as a defendant in this case because it is not sui juris. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 8/16/2010.(asni, )
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER that the Charleston County Sheriff's office is dismissed as a Defendant in this case because it is not sui juris. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 57 is granted as to all causes of action except Plaintiff's claim for retaliation under Title VII. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 3/31/10.(rpol, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
