Jenkins v. Jenkins et al
Junies A Jenkins |
Sammy Joe Jenkins, Brenda L Jenkins, Ida Mae Jenkins-Heffner, Daniel D D'Agostino, D'Agostino and D'Agostino, Barbara Ulibari, Terry Goddard, Dora B Schriro, Daryl Johnson, Arizona, State of and Department of Correction |
2:2008cv03145 |
September 18, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
XUS, Outside State |
G Ross Anderson |
Robert S Carr |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER denying 26 Motion for Reconsideration re 23 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 11/18/2008.(ssan, ) |
Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 of Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr, dismissing this complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process; denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Junies A Jenkins,and denying 20 Motion for Reconsideration of Order denying appointment of counsel filed by Junies A Jenkins. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 10/29/2008. (ssan, ) |
Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Robert S. Carr that this action be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process and that the motion for TRO or preliminary injunction be denied. Objections to R&R due by 10/31/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr on 10/14/08. (rpol, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.