Middleton v. Motley Rice LLC
Plaintiff: Jamal Antonio Middleton
Defendant: Motley Rice LLC
Case Number: 2:2008cv03256
Filed: September 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: C Weston Houck
Presiding Judge: Bristow Marchant
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 193 ORDER granting 104 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 105 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting and accepting Report and Recommendations re 158 Report and Recommendations. This case is dismissed. Signed by Honorable C Weston Houck on 8/6/2010.(vdru, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Middleton v. Motley Rice LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamal Antonio Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motley Rice LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?