Parnell v. SC, State of et al
Christopher Parnell |
SC, State of, James Cooper, Philip Newsome, Solicitor Offices, ASGDC and Two Richland County Shieffs Officer |
2:2008cv03354 |
October 2, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Richland |
Robert S Carr |
Henry M Herlong |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court adopts Magistrate Judge Carrs Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. It is thereforeORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution as to Defendant David Frier, and Defendant Friers motion for summary judgment, docket number 35, is dismissed as moot. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 11/16/09. (ltap, ) |
Filing 25 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 of Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr and dismissing all Defendants except Richland County Sheriff's Officers without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 3/24/2009. (ssan, ) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr for partial summary dismissal of all parties except "Two Richland County Sheriffs Officer" from 1 Complaint filed by Christopher Parnell. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr on 10/27/2008. (ssan, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.