Gore v. U S Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration et al
| Johnny Lee Gore |
| U S Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration and United States Attorney, Office of |
| 2:2009cv00037 |
| January 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| XUS, Outside State |
| Robert S Carr |
| Henry M Herlong |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 05:552 Freedom of Information Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 of Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr. The Complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process; 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Johnny Lee Gore is denied. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 1/28/2009. (ssan, )
|
|
Filing
7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr that 1 Complaint, filed by Johnny Lee Gore, be dismissed WITHOUT prejudice and without issuance and service of process; and that 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Johnny Lee Gore be denied because Plaintiff is barred by the three-strikes rule from seeking in forma pauperis status. Objections to R&R due by 2/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S Carr on 1/14/2009. (ssan, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
