L&L Construction LLC v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation et al
| L&L Construction LLC |
| Blanchard Machinery Company Inc and Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation |
| 2:2009cv00396 |
| February 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Charleston |
| C Weston Houck |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by L&L Construction LLC, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation, Blanchard Machinery Company Inc. (Barham, Robert) |
Filing 17
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable C Weston Houck on 5/12/09. (jwol, )
|
| Filing 15 PRE-SCHEDULING ORDER: Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the plaintiff(s) shall e-mail to chambers andserve on all parties the information required by Rule 26(a)(1) and electronically file theinformation required by Rule 26(f) of the FRCP and LCR 26.03.2 The defendant shall dolikewise within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order. 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 5/14/2009, Rule 26 Report due by 5/13/2009. Signed by Honorable C Weston Houck on 4/14/09. (jwol, ) |
| Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation.(Barham, Robert) |
| Filing 13 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation.(Barham, Robert) |
| Filing 12 Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation.(Barham, Robert) |
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Blanchard Machinery Company Inc.(Floyd, Joey) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Blanchard Machinery Company Inc.(Floyd, Joey) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation answer due 4/13/2009. Signed by Honorable C Weston Houck on 3/19/09.(jwol, ) |
| Filing 8 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by L&L Construction LLC. Blanchard Machinery Company Inc served on 3/10/2009, answer due 3/30/2009. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Scott, William) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation. Response to Motion due by 4/6/2009 Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel(Kincannon, James) |
| Filing 6 Letter from CT Corporation System determining that they are not the registered agent for Blanchard Machinery Company Inc. (jwol, ) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation. (jwol, ) |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by L&L Construction LLC.(jwol, ) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Blanchard Machinery Company Inc. (jwol, ) Modified on 2/18/2009 to correct text (jwol, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation, Blanchard Machinery Company Inc ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 1946991.), filed by L&L Construction LLC.(jwol, ) Modified on 2/18/2009 to replace incorrect document with correct document as provided by filing user (jwol, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
