Bagnal v. Foremost Insurance Group
Plaintiff: Kimberly K Bagnal
Defendant: Foremost Insurance Group
Case Number: 2:2009cv01474
Filed: June 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Berkeley
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER denying 25 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 31 Motion to Alter Judgment Signed by Chief Judge David C Norton on 03/30/11.(kozi, )
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 12 Motion for Summary Judgment Signed by Chief Judge David C Norton on 03/02/10.(kozi, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bagnal v. Foremost Insurance Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly K Bagnal
Represented By: Paul N Uricchio, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Foremost Insurance Group
Represented By: John Robert Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?