Hill v. Berkeley Family Practice LLC
Plaintiff: Tamara Hill
Defendant: Berkeley Family Practice LLC
Case Number: 2:2009cv01912
Filed: July 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Dorchester
Presiding Judge: Robert S Carr
Presiding Judge: Margaret B Seymour
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's 22 Report and Recommendations of September 14, 2010 is adopted as the Order of this Court. It is hereby Ordered that Defendant's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 10/22/10.(erav, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Berkeley Family Practice LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara Hill
Represented By: Russell M Bynum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Berkeley Family Practice LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?