Muhammad v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Lannie Muhammad
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2010cv00739
Filed: March 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Greenville
Presiding Judge: Margaret B Seymour
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JUDGMENT: The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hendricks is adopted. It is Ordered and Adjudged that the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. (cwhi, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muhammad v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lannie Muhammad
Represented By: Donald Lee Pilzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Marshall Prince
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?