Scarborough v. Lifepoint Inc

Scarborough v. Lifepoint Inc

Plaintiff:	Larry D Scarborough
Defendant:	Lifepoint Inc
Case Number:	2:2011cv00438
Filed:	February 23, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Charleston
Presiding Judge:	Richard M Gergel
Presiding Judge:	Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 13, 2012	Filing 65 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 62 Report and Recommendation granting 54 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Prosecution, filed by Lifepoint Inc Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 12/12/2012. (sshe, )
December 12, 2011	Filing 32 ORDER adopting 27 Report and Recommendations, granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs hostile work environment claim, as pled, is GRANTED. Plaintiff has leav e to amend his complaint within 15 days if he desires to plead this claim with greater specificity. Defendant's motion to dismiss the retaliatory discharge claim based upon the public policy exception is hereby DENIED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 12/12/11.(hhil, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 13, 2012

Filing 65 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 62 Report and Recommendation granting 54 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Prosecution, filed by Lifepoint Inc Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 12/12/2012. (sshe, )

December 12, 2011

Filing 32 ORDER adopting 27 Report and Recommendations, granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs hostile work environment claim, as pled, is GRANTED. Plaintiff has leav e to amend his complaint within 15 days if he desires to plead this claim with greater specificity. Defendant's motion to dismiss the retaliatory discharge claim based upon the public policy exception is hereby DENIED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 12/12/11.(hhil, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scarborough v. Lifepoint Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lifepoint Inc
Represented By:	Brian Quisenberry
Represented By:	Shawn Daughtridge Wallace
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry D Scarborough
Represented By:	Anne L Peterson-Hutto
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?