Palmetto Pharmaceuticals LLC v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
| Palmetto Pharmaceuticals LLC |
| AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP |
| 2:2011cv00807 |
| April 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Charleston Office |
| Charleston |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
442
ORDER adopting 411 The Special Master's Report and Recommendation construing the issues of claim construction. The Court overrules 415 Objection to Report and Recommendation filed by Palmetto Pharmaceuticals LLC and overrules 416 Objection to Report and Recommendation filed by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. Details set forth in Order. Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 11/30/2015.(vdru, )
|
|
Filing
342
ORDER re 265 Report and Recommendation. The Court denies 203 Defendant's motion to strike the Plaintiff's experts. Having denied the Defendant's Daubert motion, the Court finds, for the reasons set forth b y the Magistrate Judge in the R&R (ECF # 265), that genuine issues of material fact exist and therefore, the Court denies 134 Motion for Summary Judgment and also denies 320 Motion to Strike. The Court grants 322 Plaintiff's Motion to Se al its supplemental Daubert Brief. Finally, the Court requests that the parties confer and submit a proposed amended scheduling order (or orders if the parties cannot agree) within fourteen days of the date of this order. Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 4/2/2014.(vdru, ) Modified to edit text on 4/2/2014 (vdru, ).
|
|
Filing
260
ORDER adopting 252 Report and Recommendation and denying 84 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 84 Motion to Strike Defendant's invalidity defense. Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 12/3/2012.(vdru, )
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER adopting 57 Report and Recommendations. It is further ordered that the Defendant's original Motion to Dismiss (entry #14) is deemed moot, and the Defendant's subsequent motion to dismiss (entry #41) is granted in part and denied in part in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. Signed by Honorable Sol Blatt, Jr on 2/13/2012.(vdru, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
