Pennington v. Stevenson et al
Petitioner: Edward Lee Pennington
Respondent: Robert M Stevenson, III
Case Number: 2:2011cv02274
Filed: August 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Anderson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER adopting 20 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying the petition. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 5/21/12.(hhil, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pennington v. Stevenson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert M Stevenson, III
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edward Lee Pennington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?