Lesane v. Byers et al
| Michael Bernard Lesane |
| Lt Commandeer, Lt Goodman, Officer Lighty, Dr Stein, Nurse Fulton, William Byers, Anthony Padula, James Dean, A Pinkney, B Durant, Sgt Epps, Nurse Scott, Nurse Floyd and Nurse McCallaster |
| 2:2012cv00508 |
| February 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Charleston Office |
| Dorchester |
| J Michelle Childs |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER adopting 58 Report and Recommendation; granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 44 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 11/3/2014.(ssam, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER adopting 58 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks; granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's claim for money damages, and that Plaintiff's request for declarato ry and injunctive relief is dismissed; granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion to Amend/Correct. To the extent Plaintiff wishes to Amend his Complaint, that request is denied; to the extent Plaintiff wishes to amend his Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, that request is granted and Plaintiff shall file the amended response by September 3, 2013. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 8/20/2013.(ssam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
