Beasley-Forrest v. Forrest et al

Defendant: Falcon Motor Express Ltd and Charles J Forrest
Plaintiff: Brenda G Beasley-Forrest
Case Number: 2:2013cv00308
Filed: February 1, 2013
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Colleton
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beasley-Forrest v. Forrest et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Falcon Motor Express Ltd
Represented By: Brandt Robert Horton
Represented By: Duke Raleigh Highfield
Represented By: Benjamin Alexander Traywick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles J Forrest
Represented By: Nancy Doherty Sadler
Represented By: Matthew V Creech
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenda G Beasley-Forrest
Represented By: Davis A Whitfield-Cargile
Represented By: John Olin McDougall, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?