King v. Willkrys Charleston LLC et al

Defendant: Bi-Lo LLC and Willkrys Charleston LLC
Plaintiff: Susan King
Case Number: 2:2013cv01911
Filed: July 11, 2013
Court: South Carolina District Court
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Willkrys Charleston LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bi-Lo LLC
Represented By: Elizabeth F Bailey
Represented By: Duke Raleigh Highfield
Represented By: Brandt Robert Horton
Represented By: Michael BT Wilkes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Willkrys Charleston LLC
Represented By: Michael BT Wilkes
Represented By: Elizabeth F Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan King
Represented By: Abigail B Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.