Al-Haqq v. Byars et al
Bilal A Al-Haqq |
Ofc Ford, Corporal Bryant, A DeLoach, Lt Jenkins, Walter Worrick, John Pate, William R Byars, Jr, Ofc Frasier, Thomas E Byrne and Alicia Jones-Thompson |
2:2013cv02043 |
July 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Charleston Office |
Allendale |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Joseph F Anderson |
Prison:Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 112 ORDER adopting 109 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wallace W Dixon; granting 70 Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to the plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies; denying 111 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 109 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; finding as moot 36 Motion Physical Exam; finding as moot 49 Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as moot 22 Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as moot 29 Motion to Amend/Correct. The dismissal of this action shall be without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 9/3/2014.(ssam, ) |
Filing 93 ORDER adopting 78 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks; denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk is directed to refer this action back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 3/25/2014.(ssam, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.