Wright v. Goodwill Industries of Lower South Carolina
Plaintiff: Thomas E Wright
Defendant: Goodwill Industries of Lower South Carolina
Case Number: 2:2013cv03083
Filed: November 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Charleston Office
County: Charleston
Presiding Judge: C Weston Houck
Presiding Judge: Bristow Marchant
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 623
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 4/10/2014.(mcot, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Goodwill Industries of Lower South Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goodwill Industries of Lower South Carolina
Represented By: Mary Hughes Cherry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas E Wright
Represented By: Rachael Suzanne Steenbergh
Represented By: Terry Ann Rickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?