Bennett v. Stirling et al
Johnny Bennett |
Bryan P Stirling and Joseph McFadden |
2:2013cv03191 |
November 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Charleston Office |
Lexington |
Richard M Gergel |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
Death Penalty |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 ORDER adopting 98 Report and Recommendation as to Ground Three, Ground Four, Ground Five, Ground Six, and Ground Seven of the petition. The Court GRANTS Petitioner's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 67 ) as to G round One and Ground Two and DENIES Respondents' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 60 ) as to Ground One and Ground Two of the petition; GRANTS Respondents' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 60 ) as to Ground Three, Ground F our, Ground Five, Ground Six, and Ground Seven of the petition. The Court GRANTS a writ of habeas corpus vacating Petitioner's death sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for the reasons set forth above. Petitioner shall be unconditionall y released from the sentence of death entered by the Lexington County Court of General Sessions on July 16, 2000 unless, within 180 days, the State of South Carolina resentences Petitioner. To the extent Respondents seek to appeal this decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Court will consider, on the motion of Respondents, a stay of this order pending the completion of the appeal. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 3/16/2016.(ssam, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.